EDOC Web Tables

Systemic

Table 1: Interventions With Promise

Intervention or strategy

Description

7-days-per-week or 16-hours-per-day hospital operational models Access to hospital services outside the ED (e.g., diagnostic testing, medical imaging) beyond regular business hours including 7 days a week or for extended hours.
Accountability frameworks Accountability frameworks ensure accountability for ED overcrowding outcomes do not lie solely within the ED. Accountability frameworks make roles, responsibilities, and expectations clear within different zones or boundaries (e.g., surgery, diagnostic testing) and share and distribute accountability across health system partners including the ED and hospital, and importantly the health regions or authorities in which they are situated. An example of an accountability framework is a performance incentive such as paying for results, accompanied by appropriate resourcing and shared accountability for results across health system partners.
Time-based targets Implementation of time-based targets for example on ED length of stay, patient disposition, or wait time for an inpatient bed.
Coordination of electronic health records and health information among health system partners Electronic clinician-to-clinician communication and documentation may help alleviate the need for face-to-face visits to specialists and improve access to care for patients with a variety needs.
Hospital capacity command centres Physical and multifunctional units with interdisciplinary teams that influence patient flow, use real-time data integrated from electronic health records, and manage multiple patient flow processes (e.g., admission, bed management, interhospital transfer management, patient transport, environmental services).
Hospital-at-home care models Patients receive care in their own homes to target multiple factors such as preventing admissions and providing early discharge care.

Table 2: Moderate- and High-Quality Conclusive Evidencea

Intervention

Description

Characteristics across evidenceb

Intervention effectiveness by outcomec

Time-based targets Government policies to place targets on how long people are in the ED before they leave
  • Admitted patients
  • Urban settings
  • ED length of stay for admitted patients: favourable
  • People who left prematurely: favourable
Hospital transitional care Transitional care interventions to help coordinate patient care (e.g., postdischarge telephone follow-up with or without home or clinic visits)
  • Older adults with heart failure who were discharged from inpatient departments
  • ED visits: favourable (intervention with home or clinic visits)
  • ED visits: neutral (intervention without home or clinic visits)
Care coordination strategies Quality improvement strategies to coordinate care for people who visit the ED often (e.g., case management, team changes, promotion of self-management, decision support, and/or clinical information system)
  • Adults and older adults who access the ED frequently
  • People experiencing mental health challenges
  • Urban settings
  • ED visits: favourable

ED = emergency department.
a Interventions with certain evidence or evidence with some uncertainty (moderate or high certainty) that is moderate or high quality based on AMSTAR 2 ratings.
b Population and setting characteristics of the individual studies that contributed to the evidence.
c The outcome measured in the evidence with its effectiveness across the evidence. Favourable: certain evidence or evidence with some uncertainty of better effectiveness of the intervention versus a comparator. Neutral: certain evidence or evidence with some uncertainty (moderate or high certainty) that neither the intervention nor the comparator was favoured.

Table 3: New and Emerging Interventions

Intervention

Description

Implemented where?

Virtual urgent care leaf indicates implemented in Canada
  • Ontario Ministry of Health (Ontario)
Alternate outpatient accommodation for stable, hospitalized antepartum patients leaf indicates implemented in Canada
  • Edmonton, Alberta
Postpartum community care program leaf indicates implemented in Canada
  • Calgary, Alberta
Supportive oncology care at home
  • Massachusetts General Hospital, Newton-Wellesley Hospital (US)
Outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy leaf indicates implemented in Canada
  • Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre (Toronto, Ontario)
Telehealth support of elective surgery pathways leaf indicates implemented in Canada
  • University of Montreal (Montreal, Quebec)
Continuous quality improvement model leaf indicates implemented in Canada
  • Juravinski Hospital and Cancer Centre (Hamilton, Ontario)
  • Brampton, Ontario
Centralized wait lists leaf indicates implemented in Canada
  • Researchers from Canada
Accountability frameworks leaf indicates implemented in Canada
  • Authors from Canada
Mutual acculturation of hospital and ED staff
  • Boston, US
Mental health EDs integrated into general EDs leaf indicates implemented in Canada
  • Ottawa Hospital (Ottawa, Ontario)
Stepped-care mental health services leaf indicates implemented in Canada
  • Structured Psychotherapy Program, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (Ontario)
Telepsychiatry leaf indicates implemented in Canada
  • Winnipeg, Manitoba
  • Vitalité Health (New Brunswick)
Mobile mental health crisis teams for youth leaf indicates implemented in Canada
  • Sunnybrook Hospital (Toronto, Ontario)
Acute care bundle for child and youth mental health and addictions care leaf indicates implemented in Canada
  • Alberta
Onsite rapid-access addiction clinic leaf indicates implemented in Canada
  • Edmonton, Alberta
Text messaging–supported transition for young people experiencing early psychosis leaf indicates implemented in Canada
  • Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (Toronto, Ontario)
Assertive community treatment leaf indicates implemented in Canada
  • Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (Montreal, Quebec)
Crisis intervention teams
  • Researcher from the US
Psychiatric care mentors
  • Researcher from the US
Targeted diversion programs for people experiencing houselessness leaf indicates implemented in Canada
  • An 11-bed, 24-hour stabilization and connection centre staffed by harm reduction workers, peer support workers, case workers, and an on-call physician to offer an alternative to the ED for people experiencing houselessness and alcohol intoxication
  • Detoxing for people experiencing houselessness
Supportive nursing recruitment leaf indicates implemented in Canada
  • London Health Sciences Centre (London, Ontario)
24/7/365 attending radiologist coverage leaf indicates implemented in Canada
  • Vancouver General Hospital (Vancouver, British Columbia)
Optimizing ED return visits for ultrasound services leaf indicates implemented in Canada
  • Saskatchewan
After-hours primary care in nursing homes leaf indicates implemented in Canada
  • Ontario

ED = emergency department.
Note: leaf indicates implemented in Canada indicates implemented in Canada.

Table 4: Inconclusive, Unfavourable, or Low-Quality Evidence

Intervention 

Characteristics across evidencea

Intervention effectiveness by outcomeb

Telemedicine interventions for postoperative patients (e.g., telephone, video calls, email, app, or web-based follow-up)
  • Postoperative patients (e.g., cardiac, abdominal, vascular, breast, urological, orthopedic surgery)
  • ED visits: low quality, neutral, inconclusive
  • Patient satisfaction: low quality, favourable, inconclusive
Postsurgical care coordination
  • Children
  • Cerebral palsy
  • ED visits: moderate quality, neutral, inconclusive
Postdischarge home-based patient-centred intervention
  • Older adults
  • ED visits: low quality, neutral, conclusive
Pharmacist evaluation in primary care post discharge
  • Older adults
  • Cardiac conditions
  • ED visits: low quality, neutral, inconclusive
Community-based follow-up care
  • Older adults
  • Falls
  • ED revisits: moderate quality, neutral, inconclusive
Caseworker-assigned discharge plans
  • Children
  • Asthma, chronic lung diseases
  • Racialized groups
  • Urban settings
  • ED visits: high quality, mixed, inconclusive
Nurse-led telephone postdischarge intervention
  • Older adults
  • Adults
  • Children
  • ED revisits: low quality, neutral, inconclusive
Health care provider postdischarge follow-up
  • Adults
  • Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
  • ED revisits: low quality, favourable or neutral, inconclusive
Quality improvement strategies to coordinate care for people who visit the ED often (e.g., case management, team changes, promotion of self-management, decision support, and/or clinical information system)
  • Adults
  • Older adults
  • People experiencing mental health challenges
  • People experiencing houselessness
  • People who access the ED frequently
  • Proportion of patients with ED visits: moderate quality, neutral, inconclusive
Hospital discharge care transitional interventions
  • Adults
  • Older adults
  • General medicine
  • Surgery
  • Mixed diagnoses
  • ED visits: low quality, favourable, inconclusive
Nurse interventions to maintain patient flow in EDs (e.g., nurse navigators, case managers)
  • Stroke
  • ED visits: low quality, favourable, inconclusive
  • Health care professional workload: low quality, favourable, inconclusive
Hospital leadership support
  • Adults
  • ED length of stay: moderate quality, favourable, inconclusive
  • Boarding time: moderate quality, favourable, inconclusive
Protocols to reduce crowding
  • Adults
  • ED length of stay: moderate quality, mixed, inconclusive
  • Ambulance diversion times: moderate quality, favourable, inconclusive
  • Leaving without being seen: moderate quality, neutral, inconclusive
ED-managed inpatient acute care units outside the ED but within the hospital
  • Adults
  • Ambulance diversion times: moderate quality, favourable, inconclusive
  • Leaving without being seen: moderate quality, favourable, inconclusive
Incentive payments for primary care practices, patient-centred medical home status in the US
  • Adults with high health care needs
  • Chronic conditions
  • Depression
  • People requiring assistance with activities of daily living
  • ED visits: moderate quality, favourable or neutral, inconclusive
Government policies to place targets on how long people stay in the ED before they leave
  • Adults
  • Children
  • Urban settings
  • ED length of stay: moderate quality, favourable, inconclusive
  • ED-related wait times: moderate quality, favourable, inconclusive
  • Boarding time: moderate quality, unfavourable, inconclusive
  • ED occupancy: moderate quality, favourable, inconclusive
  • Mortality in ED: moderate quality, favourable, inconclusive
  • ED revisits: moderate quality, favourable, inconclusive
  • Patient satisfaction: moderate quality, favourable, inconclusive
Practices receiving fee-for-service
  • Not reported
  • ED length of stay: low quality, neutral, inconclusive
Nationally mandated time-based targets
  • Not reported
  • ED length of stay: moderate quality, favourable, inconclusive
  • ED-related wait times: moderate quality, favourable, inconclusive
  • Access block: moderate quality, favourable, inconclusive
  • ED revisits: moderate quality, favourable, inconclusive
  • ED occupancy: moderate quality, favourable, inconclusive
  • Left without being seen: moderate quality, favourable, inconclusive
Time-based targets
  • Not reported
  • ED overcrowding: moderate quality, favourable, inconclusive
  • ED length of stay: moderate quality, mixed, inconclusive
  • ED-related wait times: moderate quality, favourable, inconclusive
  • Intensive care unit exit block: moderate quality, unfavourable, inconclusive
  • Mortality in ED: moderate quality, neutral, inconclusive
  • ED revisits: moderate quality, mixed, inconclusive
  • Patient did not wait: moderate quality, favourable, inconclusive

ED = emergency department.
a Population and setting characteristics of the individual studies that contributed to the evidence.
b The outcome measured in the evidence with its quality based on A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews Version 2 (AMSTAR 2) ratings and the effectiveness across the evidence. Inconclusive: very uncertain evidence (has low or very low certainty). Unfavourable: unfavourable effectiveness of the intervention on outcomes versus a comparator. Low quality: systematic review has a critical flaw based on AMSTAR 2 ratings and may not provide an accurate and comprehensive summary of the available studies that address the question of interest. Moderate quality: systematic review has more than 1 weakness, but no critical flaws. High quality: systematic review provides an accurate and comprehensive summary of the results of the available studies that address the question of interest. Favourable: certain evidence or evidence with some uncertainty of better effectiveness of the intervention versus a comparator. Neutral: certain evidence or evidence with some uncertainty (moderate or high certainty) that neither the intervention nor the comparator was favoured. Mixed: heterogeneous results for effectiveness of an intervention versus a comparator, and the heterogeneity is too serious to draw a conclusion. Unfavourable: unfavourable effectiveness of the intervention on outcomes versus a comparator. Inconclusive: very uncertain evidence (has low or very low certainty). No evidence: there is no evidence from primary studies.