Newborn Screening for Congenital Cytomegalovirus

Details

Question

  1. What is the clinical utility of universal NBS versus targeted or no newborn screening for cCMV?
  2. What is the cost-effectiveness of universal NBS versus targeted or no newborn screening for cCMV?
  3. What are the evidence-based guidelines regarding NBS for cCMV?

Key Message

What Is the Issue?

  • Congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) is estimated to affect between 0.2% and 2.4% of newborns worldwide, and may cause long-term effects, including hearing loss and neurodevelopmental disability.
  • Newborn screening for cCMV can identify affected neonates and provide an opportunity for early treatment, which may reduce any long-term effects from infection.
  • We wanted to know if universal newborn screening is a clinically effective and cost-effective intervention for identifying and managing cCMV.

What Did We Do?

  • We identified and summarized published literature comparing the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of universal newborn screening with either targeted newborn screening or no screening for congenital cytomegalovirus in neonates. We also identified and summarized published, evidence-based guidelines that make recommendations concerning the use of newborn screening for congenital cytomegalovirus to help inform decisions considering the use of this intervention.
  • An information specialist searched for peer-reviewed and grey literature sources published between January 1, 2014, and March 19, 2024. The search was limited to English-language documents. One reviewer screened articles for eligibility based on predefined criteria, critically appraised the included studies, and narratively summarized the findings.

What Did We Find?

  • Evidence from 1 prospective cohort study in the US found that, compared to universal newborn screening for cCMV, targeted newborn screening failed to identify a significant proportion of neonates who developed hearing loss associated with infection.
  • Three cost-effectiveness evaluations concluded that universal newborn screening for cCMV was cost-effective when compared to targeted newborn screening or no screening. None of these analyses were specific to the Canadian context.
  • While 1 of 3 evidence-based guidelines identified by this review makes a recommendation favouring universal newborn screening for cCMV, 2 evidence-based guidelines recommend against the implementation of universal newborn screening for cCMV (including 1 from the Canadian context), generally citing a lack of sufficient clinical evidence.

What Does This Mean?

  • The included cost-effectiveness studies and evidence-based guidelines in this report emphasize that limited clinical evidence is currently available to inform decision-making concerning newborn screening for cCMV.

Jurisdictions where universal newborn screening for cCMV has been implemented provide an opportunity for clinical research to support and inform future decision-making.

The current limitation of available clinical data describing newborn screening for cCMV will require decision-makers to draw from a broader set of inputs and sources than those available from empirical studies.

Exploration of the Risk of Suicidality and Self-Harm With Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists

Details

Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists are used to treat type 2 diabetes. Some of these drugs are also used for weight management. Recently, there have been reports of suicide or self-harm in patients treated with these drugs. This report critically appraised published observational studies evaluating suicidality and self-harm behaviours among patients with type 2 diabetes, and patients with obesity who do not have diabetes, treated with GLP-1 receptor agonists.

Use of MRI and CT in Private Imaging Facilities in Canada (2021-2023)

Details

Question

​The objective of this report is to provide information on the number and cost of MRI and CT exams conducted during the 2021 to 2022 and 2022 to 2023 fiscal years in Canadian privately owned imaging facilities. This report summarizes the results of a survey distributed to private imaging facilities in Canada that offer MRI and/or CT exams.

Key Message

​The private, for-profit imaging landscape is expanding and is anticipated to continue expanding due to changes in some provincial government policies aimed at reducing wait lists.

The collection of data on private imaging can help to build a complete and comprehensive picture of overall procedural capacity across the country.

Estimates on the number of publicly funded exams conducted in private facilities can inform the extent to which wait times have been impacted by the shift in some provincial government policies.

The number of MRI and CT exams conducted at private facilities has increased over the past 4 fiscal years, with the exception of the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic (2020 to 2021).

Payment through private insurance and out-of-pocket payments were the main funding sources for MRI scans in 2021 to 2023 in the private setting. Provincial health care insurance was the main funding source for CT scans conducted at private facilities.

General Ultrasound Examination Volumes per Sonographer 8-Hour Workday

Details

Key Message

  • The average number of general ultrasound examinations performed by a sonographer in an 8-hour workday is not well reported in the literature. Through an informal survey, we estimate that the average general ultrasound examination volume across Canada per 8-hour workday is 11.25, with a range of 9 to 14.
  • Understanding ultrasound examination data volumes provides information to help understand productivity. Decision-makers can also use the examination volume data and factors affecting sonographer examination throughput to create strategies to enhance efficiency in clinic and hospital departments.
  • Factors that may influence the average examination rate include examination time, the age of equipment, resource availability, staffing shortages, and sonographer’s work-related musculoskeletal disorders and stress.

Outpatient Nirmatrelvir-Ritonavir and Remdesivir Utilization in Canada

Details

A retrospective cohort study was conducted to determine the outpatient utilization of nirmatrelvir-ritonavir and remdesivir in Canada. For nirmatrelvir-ritonavir, administrative health databases from Alberta, British Columbia, Manitoba, Ontario, Quebec, and Saskatchewan were used. For remdesivir, aggregate data for outpatient remdesivir prescriptions from the Ontario Ministry of Health, the Saskatchewan Health Authority, and the Winnipeg Regional Health Authority were obtained. Outpatient remdesivir infusions are not routinely captured in prescription drug claims.

Renal Denervation

Details

Question

  1. ​What is the clinical effectiveness of renal denervation in individuals with uncontrolled hypertension?

Key Message

What Is the Issue?

It is estimated that 23% of adults in Canada have hypertension. About 1/3 of this population have uncontrolled hypertension, a condition in which (BP) blood pressure levels continue to remain high despite treatment. People with high BP despite being prescribed 3 or more blood pressure-lowering (antihypertensive) medicines are considered to have uncontrolled resistant hypertension. Renal denervation is a therapy that involves disrupting activity in the sympathetic nerves in the renal artery using a minimally invasive catheter-based procedure to treat high BP. We wanted to know if renal denervation would effectively and safely reduce BP in people with uncontrolled hypertension.

What Did We Do? 

We identified and summarized the literature comparing the clinical effectiveness and safety of renal denervation in individuals with uncontrolled hypertension to help guide decisions on the use of this intervention. An information specialist searched for peer-reviewed and grey literature sources published between January 1, 2019, and February 5, 2024. The search was limited to English-language documents. One reviewer screened articles for inclusion based on predefined criteria, critically appraised the included studies, and narratively summarized the findings.

What Did We Find? 

The evidence for this report was based on 2 systematic reviews and 3 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Renal denervation could lead to a reduction in BP compared to sham in adults with uncontrolled nonresistant hypertension. It is uncertain if renal denervation is an effective treatment for resistant hypertension and suspected hypertensive heart disease due to the methodological limitations of the included studies. Serious side effects of renal denervation were rare.

What Does This Mean? 

Our findings agree with evidence-based guidelines and real-world evidence that suggest renal denervation can be considered a treatment option for patients with uncontrolled nonresistant hypertension. Other factors, including costs and resources, equity, acceptability, and patient selection, should be considered when implementing renal denervation in Canada, where it remains an emerging medical technology. Future research should assess important patient outcomes, such as quality of life.

Patterns in Utilization of Long-Acting Inhaled Drugs for the Treatment of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Details

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is characterized by progressive airway obstruction, lung inflammation, limited expiratory flow with subsequent lung hyperinflation, and increasing frequency and severity of exacerbations. Standard maintenance pharmacotherapy for COPD aims to improve symptoms and quality of life while preventing harmful exacerbations. Treatment comprises various combinations of bronchodilators (long-acting beta2-agonists and long-acting muscarinic antagonists) and inhaled corticosteroids.